If I'm the interviewer, I'd ask you two follow-ups:
1. So given that past SC cases have really only centered on evidence potentially useful in a criminal trial (and it was a special prosecutor, not Congress making the request), does U.S. vs. Nixon say *anything* about today's conflict?
2. So Professor Dorf, are you basically saying that it might never reach the high court because the first one (Congress or the Pres) to complain could in effect be the losers if the Court turns down the case? And it may be that neither side wants to take that risk?
3 Comments:
At 10:49 AM,
egarber said…
This post has been removed by the author.
At 10:50 AM,
egarber said…
This post has been removed by the author.
At 11:38 AM,
egarber said…
If I'm the interviewer, I'd ask you two follow-ups:
1. So given that past SC cases have really only centered on evidence potentially useful in a criminal trial (and it was a special prosecutor, not Congress making the request), does U.S. vs. Nixon say *anything* about today's conflict?
2. So Professor Dorf, are you basically saying that it might never reach the high court because the first one (Congress or the Pres) to complain could in effect be the losers if the Court turns down the case? And it may be that neither side wants to take that risk?
Post a Comment
<< Home